Sorry everyone - this is going to be a bit rambly (plus I'm not sure there's an actual point! BUT............I want to start a comlimentary thread to eml's fascinating one from the weekend about 'kick along or technical riding'. This time from the pupils point of view. So........ a sizzling electronic sausage (Ooo-eer that sounds a bit dubious doesn't it? :redface - Extra Special Pork, Sunblush tomato & basil, naturally - to anyone who can be bothered to plough through the following.
I feel like I'm about to 'fess up AA meeting stylee. You see, I've only just realised that there's a difference :banghead: A great chasm of ignorance has opened up in front of me, and I feel like I've 'wasted' years learning very little apart from the most basic of basics.:furious: As a pupil with no horsey time apart from the weekly RS lesson you trust your instructor (certainly as a little 'un) and rely on them to teach in the fullest sense of the word.
When I learnt as an 8-9yo in the late '60s I went to an extraordinary 'city' RS in a Liverpool suburb. Cue dusty cobweb laden, mildewed mirrored indoor school and a really Dickensian lead character who wore hunting style breeches & boots and taught in a very 'military' style. I recall his beautiful bright chestnut horse called 'Allah' (how politically incorrect is that?) and how he used to lose his temper and hurl his stick at the ponies. Looking back I can see it was a dated teaching style even then, but I didn't know any different. At least it was a proper grounding, but rider centred rather than horse centred.
Since then Iv'e had lessons at another 6 RSs over the years, with breaks in between. And I don't recall being taught anything explicitly about balance, seat aids, or any other technical aspects of riding. It's as if some RIs (only some) learn a sort of shorthand way of getting the outcomes they want, and settle for certain phrases which they use - and skip the explanation of the WHY stage altogether. And we riders (or at least dim old me) don't always get it!:stomp: Or we focus too much on ourselves and our riding. e.g. ref seat aids. an RI may say 'Sit tall' or 'sit up nice and straight' when about to transition from say, trot to walk. I took this to be to avoid the novicey thing of tipping forward on transitions, but of course it's about giving a signal to the horse too. How come in all these years I never understood this?
In a total of 7 RSs we only ever did lateral work in 1, and that was only a simple leg yield. On a lesson when on holiday this year a patient RI nearly wet herself trying to explain serpentines and demi voltes (sp?) to me. I didn't have a clue, certainly about the latter, and she seemed amazed, and asked "What exactly DO you do on your lessons?" Tbh I felt mortified, and left rather deflated. It's been churning over in my mind ever since - a horrible feeling that I've missed out on something - like I've been robbed of all those years.............:cry:
Riding my occasional ride leg at each corner all-rounder connie over the summer I have found out for myself that you can steer a well schooled ponio by just thinking (well almost). You hardly need to move a muscle, and the tiniest shift in balance, rein or leg pressure has an effect. This is a revelation to me. Although this is an exciting discovery it makes me feel like oop: too.
Yes, definately teaching methods have changed over the years. (Always stting trot into canter for me, left the only place where they didn't teach that) but are they any better? Is anyone else in the same position as me - have you noticed that there is a lack of explanation about why we are asked to do things? Anyone suddenly realised they know nothing? I could cry, and it's beginning to bug me :help:
Please, please dont' think is an attack on RSs and RIs. It's not. I love the place that I ride and my teacher. Maybe for a happy hacker and occasional rider it's OK to just do the basics, but I feel there's so much more out there, and I'm not sure how to get at it. On the other hand I may have been taught well and learned badly. I know this makes me one of eml's kick to go and pull to slow pupils, but this is over a total of 10 years of weekly lessons, right through the 70's, 80's, 90's and the last 2 years.
So - here's some thoughts to get you going. (just playing devil's advocate, these thing may not be factors at all.)
Have I been unlucky with where I've learnt?
Has using 'budget' riding centres contributed?
Am I just self-obsessed and thick?
Have I really been let down?
Are most RS horses 'over routined'
Am I overthinking this?
As they used to say back in school - Discuss.
Sorry. Lemon sorbet to follow the sausage snacklet if you got this far. Apologies for the self-indulgence....................
I feel like I'm about to 'fess up AA meeting stylee. You see, I've only just realised that there's a difference :banghead: A great chasm of ignorance has opened up in front of me, and I feel like I've 'wasted' years learning very little apart from the most basic of basics.:furious: As a pupil with no horsey time apart from the weekly RS lesson you trust your instructor (certainly as a little 'un) and rely on them to teach in the fullest sense of the word.
When I learnt as an 8-9yo in the late '60s I went to an extraordinary 'city' RS in a Liverpool suburb. Cue dusty cobweb laden, mildewed mirrored indoor school and a really Dickensian lead character who wore hunting style breeches & boots and taught in a very 'military' style. I recall his beautiful bright chestnut horse called 'Allah' (how politically incorrect is that?) and how he used to lose his temper and hurl his stick at the ponies. Looking back I can see it was a dated teaching style even then, but I didn't know any different. At least it was a proper grounding, but rider centred rather than horse centred.
Since then Iv'e had lessons at another 6 RSs over the years, with breaks in between. And I don't recall being taught anything explicitly about balance, seat aids, or any other technical aspects of riding. It's as if some RIs (only some) learn a sort of shorthand way of getting the outcomes they want, and settle for certain phrases which they use - and skip the explanation of the WHY stage altogether. And we riders (or at least dim old me) don't always get it!:stomp: Or we focus too much on ourselves and our riding. e.g. ref seat aids. an RI may say 'Sit tall' or 'sit up nice and straight' when about to transition from say, trot to walk. I took this to be to avoid the novicey thing of tipping forward on transitions, but of course it's about giving a signal to the horse too. How come in all these years I never understood this?
In a total of 7 RSs we only ever did lateral work in 1, and that was only a simple leg yield. On a lesson when on holiday this year a patient RI nearly wet herself trying to explain serpentines and demi voltes (sp?) to me. I didn't have a clue, certainly about the latter, and she seemed amazed, and asked "What exactly DO you do on your lessons?" Tbh I felt mortified, and left rather deflated. It's been churning over in my mind ever since - a horrible feeling that I've missed out on something - like I've been robbed of all those years.............:cry:
Riding my occasional ride leg at each corner all-rounder connie over the summer I have found out for myself that you can steer a well schooled ponio by just thinking (well almost). You hardly need to move a muscle, and the tiniest shift in balance, rein or leg pressure has an effect. This is a revelation to me. Although this is an exciting discovery it makes me feel like oop: too.
Yes, definately teaching methods have changed over the years. (Always stting trot into canter for me, left the only place where they didn't teach that) but are they any better? Is anyone else in the same position as me - have you noticed that there is a lack of explanation about why we are asked to do things? Anyone suddenly realised they know nothing? I could cry, and it's beginning to bug me :help:
Please, please dont' think is an attack on RSs and RIs. It's not. I love the place that I ride and my teacher. Maybe for a happy hacker and occasional rider it's OK to just do the basics, but I feel there's so much more out there, and I'm not sure how to get at it. On the other hand I may have been taught well and learned badly. I know this makes me one of eml's kick to go and pull to slow pupils, but this is over a total of 10 years of weekly lessons, right through the 70's, 80's, 90's and the last 2 years.
So - here's some thoughts to get you going. (just playing devil's advocate, these thing may not be factors at all.)
Have I been unlucky with where I've learnt?
Has using 'budget' riding centres contributed?
Am I just self-obsessed and thick?
Have I really been let down?
Are most RS horses 'over routined'
Am I overthinking this?
As they used to say back in school - Discuss.
Sorry. Lemon sorbet to follow the sausage snacklet if you got this far. Apologies for the self-indulgence....................